Kompleksowe podejście interdyscyplinarne do modelowania kształcenia w zakresie edukacji informacyjnej
Tibor Koltay
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-7527
Afiliacja: Independent Researcher Budapest, Hungary, Węgry
Enikő Szőke-Milinte
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6493-6778
Afiliacja: Vitéz János Institute of Teacher Training Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary, Węgry
Abstrakt
Cel/Teza: W artykule omówiono najważniejsze zagadnienia teoretyczne i ramy badawcze, które mogą służyć za podstawę do opracowania modeli kształcenia w zakresie edukacji informacyjnej.
Koncepcja/Metody badań: W artykule dokonano przeglądu piśmiennictwa tematu od lat 90. XX w. do obecnej chwili oraz zarysowano kontekst dyscyplinarny edukacji informacyjnej w celu zidentyfikowania koncepcji, które mogą okazać się przydatne w modelowaniu kształcenia w zakresie edukacji
informacyjnej.
Wyniki i wnioski: W świetle konwergencji i pokrywania się znaczeń różnych koncepcji dotyczących kompetencji, niniejszy artykuł rozważa różne podejścia pedagogiczne – fenomenograficzne, socjokulturowe oraz analizę dyskursu – w celu połączenia ich z podejściem kognitywnym do kształcenia w zakresie edukacji informacyjnej. Przegląd piśmiennictwa pokazuje, że wszystkie te podejścia mogą mieć wkład w podstawę teoretyczną kształcenia w zakresie edukacji informacyjnej w różnych grupach wiekowych i na różnych poziomach edukacji.
Oryginalność/Wartość poznawcza: Kształcenie w zakresie edukacji informacyjnej zostało przeanalizowane z perspektywy interdyscyplinarnej, z naciskiem na naukę o informacji i pedagogikę.
Słowa kluczowe
Edukacja informacyjna; Fenomenografia; Nauka o informacji; Pedagogika; Podejście dyskursu analitycznego; Podejście kognitywne; Podejście socjokulturowe
Bibliografia
AASL. (1998). Information Power. Building Partnership for Learning. American Association of School Librarians, Association for Educational Communications Technology, Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
Aharony, N., Limberg, L., Julien, H., Albright, K., Fourie, I., Bronstein, J. (2017). Information Literacy in an Era of Information Uncertainty. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 528–531, https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401063
ALISE. (2016). ALISE Research Taxonomy [online]. Association for Library and Information Science Education [26.09.2020], https://www.alise.org/research-taxonomy
Bawden, D. (2015). On Not Being a Weak Discipline [online]. The Occasional Informationist [14.09.2020], https://theoccasionalinformationist.com/2015/07/06/on-not-being-a-weak-discipline/
Bawden, D., Robinson, L. (2009). The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191, https://doi. org/10.1177/0165551508095781
Bawden, D., Robinson, L. (2016). Super-Science, Fundamental Dimension, Way of Being: Library and Information Science in an Age of Messages. In: Kelly M. & Bielby J. (eds.). Information Cultures in the Digital Age (pp.31–43). Springer VS, Wiesbaden, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_2
Bruce, C. S. (1997). Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Blackwood: Auslib Press.
Bruce, C. S. (2016). Information Literacy Research: Dimensions of the Emerging Collective Con¬sciousness. A reflection. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47(4), 239–244, https://doi. org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1248236
Buckland, M. (1991). Information as Thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351–360, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5<351::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-3
CILIP. (2018). CILIP Definition of Information Literacy [online]. CILIP. The Library and Information Association [14.09.2020], https://infolit.org.uk/ILdefinitionCILIP2018.pdf
Csapó, B. (1992). Kognitív pedagógia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Dora, M., Kumar, H. A. (2019). National and International Trends in Library and Information Science Research: A Comparative Review of the Literature [online]. IFLA Journal, First Published December 2019 [14.09.2020], https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035219886610
Eysenck, M. W, Keane, M. T. (1997). Kognitív pszichológia. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
Forster, M. (2016). Phenomenography: A Methodology for Information Literacy Research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(4), 353–362, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614566481
Haider, J., Bawden, D. (2007). Conceptions of “Information Poverty” in LIS: A Discourse Analysis. Journal of Documentation, 63(4), 534–557, https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710759002
Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. A White Paper on the Digital and Media Literacy Recommendations of the Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Com¬munities in a Democracy. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
Koltay, T. (2015). Data Literacy: In Search of a Name and Identity. Journal of Documentation, 71(2), 401–415, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2014-0026
Koltay, T., Špiranec, S., Karvalics, L (2016). Research 2.0 and the Future of Information Literacy. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Lau, J. (2013). Conceptual Relationship of Information Literacy and Media Literacy. In: A. Lee, J. Lau, T. Carbo & N. Gendina (eds.). Conceptual Relationship of Information Literacy and Media Literacy in Knowledge Societies (pp. 76–91). Paris: UNESCO.
Lee, A. Y., So, C. Y. (2014). Media Literacy and Information Literacy: Similarities and Differences. Comunicar, 21(42), https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-13
Limberg, L., Sundin, O., Talja, S. (2013). Three Theoretical Perspectives on Information Literacy. Human IT: Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human Science, 11(2), 93–130.
Livingstone, S., van Couvering, E. J., Thumin, N. (2008). Converging Traditions of Research on Media and Information Literacies: Disciplinary and Methodological Issues. In: J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lank¬shear & D.J. Leu, (eds.). Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 103–132). New York: Routledge.
Lloyd, A. (2006). Information Literacy Landscapes: An Emerging Picture. Journal of Documentation, 62(5), 570–583, https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610688723
Lloyd, A. (2010). Information Literacy Landscapes: Information Literacy in Education, Workplace and Everyday Contexts. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Lloyd, A. (2012). Information Literacy as a Socially Enacted Practice: Sensitising Themes for an Emerging Perspective of People-in-Practice. Journal of Documentation, 68(6), 772–783, https:// doi.org/10.1108/00220411211277037
Lloyd, A. (2017). Information Literacy and Literacies of Information: A Mid-Range Theory and Model. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 91−105, https://doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2185
Mackey, T. P., Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 62–78, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1
Machlup, F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Marcum, J. W. (2002). Rethinking Information Literacy. Library Quarterly, 72(1), 1–26, https://doi. org/10.1086/603335
Materska, K. (2014). Information Heuristics of Information Literate People. In: S. Kurbanoğlu, S. Špiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi & R. Catts (eds.). Information Literacy, Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century (pp. 59–69). Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-14136-7_7
Morrison, C., Secker, J. (2017). Understanding Librarians’ Experiences of Copyright: Findings from a Phenomenographic Study of UK Information Professionals. Library Management, 38(6/7), 354–368, https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-01–2017-0011
Nagy, J. (2000). XXI. század és nevelés. Budapest: Osiris.
New London Group (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Edu¬cational Review 66(10), 60–92, https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Onyancha, O. B. (2020). Knowledge Visualization and Mapping of Information Literacy, 1975–2018. IFLA Journal, 46(2), 107–123, https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220906536
Paisley, W. (1980). Information and Work. In: B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (eds.). Progress in Communi¬cation Sciences vol. 2 (pp. 113–165). New Jersey: Ablex.
Palmaru, R. (2016). Constructivism as a Key Towards Further Understanding of Communication, Culture and Society. Constructivist Foundations, 12(1), 30–38.
Pfaff-Rüdiger, S., Riesmeyer, C. (2016). Moved into Action. Media Literacy as Social Process. Journal of Children and Media, 10(2), 164–172, https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1127838
Pilerot, O. (2016). Connections Between Research and Practice in the Information Literacy Narrative: A Mapping of the Literature and Some Propositions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(4), 313–321, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614559140
Pinto, M., Escalona-Fernández M.I., Pulgarín, A. (2013). Information Literacy in Social Sciences and Health Sciences: A Bibliometric Study (1974–2011). Scientometrics, 95, 1071–1094, https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192–012-0899-y
Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (revised edition). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Robinson, L. (2009). Information Science: Communication Chain and Domain Analysis. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 578–591, https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910970267
Salisbury, F., Karasmanis, S. (2011). Are They Ready? Exploring Student Information Literacy Skills in the Transition from Secondary to Tertiary Education. Australian Academic and Research Li¬braries, 42(1), 43–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2011.10722203
Secker, J. (2018). The Revised CILIP Definition of Information Literacy. Journal of Information Lite¬racy, 12(1), 156–158, http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/12.1.2454
Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.
Špiranec, S., Banek Zorica, M. (2010). Information Literacy 2.0: Hype or Discourse Refinement? Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 140–153, https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011016407
Špiranec, S., Banek Zorica, M., Kos, D. (2016). Information Literacy in Participatory Environments: The Turn Towards a Critical Literacy Perspective. Journal of Documentation, 72(2), 247–264, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06–2015-0072
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talja, S., Lloyd, A. (2010). Integrating Theories of Learning, Literacies and Information Practices. In: A. Lloyd & Talja, S. (eds.). Practising Information Literacy, Bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy Together (pp. ix–xviii). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
Thorne, S. (2013). Digital Literacies. In: M. Hawkins (ed.), Framing Languages and Literacies: Socially Situated Views and Perspectives (pp. 192–218). New York: Routledge.
Todd, R. J. (2017). Information Literacy: Agendas for a Sustainable Future. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 120–136, https://doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2233
Walton, G. (2017). Information Literacy is a Subversive Activity: Developing a Research-Based Theory of Information Discernment. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 137–155, https:// doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2188
Walton, G., Cleland, J. (2017). Information Literacy: Empowerment or Reproduction in Practice? A Di¬scourse Analysis Approach. Journal of Documentation, 73(4), 582–594, https://doi.org/10.1108/ JD-04–2015-0048
Wang, L., Bruce, C., Hughes, H. (2011). Sociocultural Theories and Their Application in Information Literacy Research and Education. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 42(4), 296–308, https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2011.10722242
Webber, S., Johnston, B. (2000), Conceptions of Information Literacy: New Perspectives and Implica¬tions. Journal of Information Science, 26(6), 381–397, https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600602
Whitworth, A. (2014). Radical Information Literacy: Reclaiming the Political Heart of the Information Literacy Movement. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-7527
Afiliacja: Independent Researcher Budapest, Hungary, Węgry
Biogram:
Dr. habil. TIBOR KOLTAY, PhD is Professor and Independent Researcher, retired from Eszterházy Károly
University, Hungary. His main interests are information literacy and other literacies, as well as Research
Data Management. His most recent publication in this field is Quality of Open Research Data: Values,
Convergences and Governance. Information, 11(4) (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/info11040175
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6493-6778
Afiliacja: Vitéz János Institute of Teacher Training Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary, Węgry
Biogram:
ENIKÖ SZÖKE-MILINTE, PhD is Associate Professor, Head of Vitéz János Teacher Training Center at
Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary. Her research focuses on media and communication education
and teacher education. Her publications include Theory and Practice in Communication Course Books.
Acta Didactica Napocensia, 6(3), 45–54. (2013) and Didactic Teaching Strategies for Successful Learning.
Revista PedActa, 3(2), 49–57. (2013). Her Hungarian language monograph, titled Információ – média
(tudatosság) – műveltség (Information – Media Awareness – Literacy) was published in 2020.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe
