Ilościowa analiza wykorzystania oprogramowania w badaniach bibliometrycznych

Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062

Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bales, M. E., Wright, D. N., Oxley, P. R., Wheeler, T. R. (2020). Bibliometric Visualization and Analysis Software: State of the Art, Workflows, and Best Practices [online] [19.12.2021], https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/69597

Bouchard, L., Albertini, M., Batista, R., de Montigny, J. (2015). Research on Health Inequalities: A Bibliometric Analysis (1966–2014). Social Science & Medicine, 141, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.022

Chamberlain, S., Boettiger, C., Ram, K., rOpenSci (2021). rplos: Interface to the Search API for “PLoS” Journals (Version 1.0.0) [online]. Cran R-Project, [19.12.2021], https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rplos/index.html

Clarivate (2021). HistCite: No longer in active development or officially supported [online]. Clarivate [19.12.2021], https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/HistCite-Nolonger-in-active-development-or-officially-supported?language=en_US

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F. (2011). Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525

Cooper, I. D. (2015). Bibliometrics Basics. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 103(4), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536–5050.103.4.013

CRAN (n.d.). The Comprehensive R Archive Network [online], [19.12.2021], https://cran.r-project.org/

Cronin, B. (2015). Getting Started in Social Network Analysis with NETDRAW [online] [19.12.2021], https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74244341.pdf

Decan, A., Mens, T., Claes, M., Grosjean, P. (2015). On the Development and Distribution of R Packages [online]. Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops [19.12.2021], https://doi.org/10.1145/2797433.2797476

Dembe, A. E., Partridge, J. S., Geist, L. C. (2011). Statistical Software Applications Used in Health Services Research: Analysis of Published Studies in the U.S. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472–6963-11–252

Du, C., Cohoon, J., Lopez, P., Howison, J. (2021). Softcite Dataset: A Dataset of Software Mentions in Biomedical and Economic Research Publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(7), 870–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24454

Du, C., Howison, J., Lopez, P. (n.d.). Softcite: Automatic Extraction of Software Mentions in Research Literature [online] [19.12.2021], https://scinlp.org/history/2020/pdfs/softcite-automaticextraction-of-software-mentions-in-research-literature.pdf

Elie, L., Granier, C., Rigot, S. (2021). The Different Types of Renewable Energy Finance: A Bibliometric Analysis. Energy Economics, 93, 104997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104997

Gentleman, R. C., Carey, V. J., Bates, D. M., Bolstad, B., Dettling, M., Dudoit, S., ... Zhang, J. (2004). Bioconductor: Open Software Development for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. Genome Biology, 5(10), R80. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80

German, D. M., Adams, B., Hassan, A. E. (2013). The Evolution of the R Software Ecosystem. 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2013.33

Hamid Jamali, R. (n.d.). Scientometric Portal [online] [19.12.2021], https://sites.google.com/site/hjamali/scientometric-portal

Howison, J., Bullard, J. (2016b). Software in the Scientific Literature: Problems With Seeing, Finding, and Using Software Mentioned in the Biology Literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2137–2155. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23538

Howison, J., Deelman, E., McLennan, M. J., Ferreira da Silva, R., Herbsleb, J. D. (2015). Understanding the Scientific Software Ecosystem and Its Impact: Current and Future Measures. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv014

Hutchins, B. I., Baker, K. L., Davis, M. T., Diwersy, M. A., Haque, E., Harriman, R. M., ... Santangelo, G. M. (2019). The NIH Open Citation Collection: A Public Access, Broad Coverage Resource. PLOS Biology, 17(10), e3000385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000385

Joppa, L., Mcinerny, G., Harper, R., Salido, L., Takeda, K., O’Hara, K., ... Emmott, S. (2013). Troubling Trends in Scientific Software Use. Science (New York, N.Y.), 340, 814–815. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231535

Kammerer, K., Göster, M., Reichert, M., Pryss, R. (2021). Ambalytics: A Scalable and Distributed System Architecture Concept for Bibliometric Network Analyses. Future Internet, 13(8), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080203

Kaur, J., Hoang, D. T., Sun, X., Possamai, L., JafariAsbagh, M., Patil, S., Menczer, F. (2012a). Scholarometer: A Social Framework for Analyzing Impact Across Disciplines. PLOS ONE, 7(9), e43235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043235

Kaur, J., Hoang, D. T., Sun, X., Possamai, L., JafariAsbagh, M., Patil, S., Menczer, F. (2012b). Scholarometer: A Social Framework for Analyzing Impact Across Disciplines. PLOS ONE, 7(9), e43235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043235

Li, K., Yan, E. (2018). Co-mention Network of R Packages: Scientific Impact and Clustering Structure. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.001

Li, L., Catalá-López, F., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Tian, J., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Pieper, D., Yang, K. (2016). The Global Research Collaboration of Network Meta-Analysis: A Social Network Analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(9), e0163239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163239

Majeed, S., Uzair, M., Qamar, U., Farooq, A. (2020). Social Network Analysis Visualization Tools: A Comparative Review. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC50486.2020.9318162

Mayernik, M. S., Hart, D. L., Maull, K. E., Weber, N. M. (2017). Assessing and Tracing the Outcomes and Impact of Research Infrastructures. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(6), 1341–1359. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23721

Meho, L. I., Yang, K. (2007). Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science Versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677

Microsoft (2021). Microsoft Excel [online] [19.12.2021], https://www.microsoft.com/pl-pl/microsoft-365/excel

Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An Up-To-Date Review. El Profesional de La Información, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03

Moral-Munoz, J. A., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Cobo, M. J. (2019). Science Mapping Analysis Software Tools: A Review. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 159–185). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_7

Pajek (2007). WoS2Pajek. Package for Large Network Analysis [online] [19.12.2021], http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/WoS2Pajek/default.htm

Pan, X., Yan, E., Cui, M., Hua, W. (2018). Examining the Usage, Citation, and Diffusion Patterns of Bibliometric Mapping Software: A Comparative Study of Three Tools. Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.005

Pan, X., Yan, E., Cui, M., Hua, W. (2019). How Important Is Software to Library and Information Science Research? A Content Analysis of Full-Text Publications. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.002

Pan, X., Yan, E., Hua, W. (2016). Disciplinary Differences of Software Use and Impact in Scientific Literature. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1593–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2138-4

Pan, X., Yan, E., Wang, Q., Hua, W. (2015). Assessing the Impact of Software on Science: A Bootstrapped Learning of Software Entities in Full-Text Papers. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.012

PLOS (n.d.). Text & Data Mining [online] [19.12.2021], https://plos.org/text-and-data-mining/

PLOS ONE (n.d.). Materials, Softwares, and Code Sharing [online]. Plos One, [19.12.2021], https:// journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-software-and-code-sharing

Pradhan, P. (2016). Science Mapping and Visualization Tools Used in Bibliometric & Scientometric Studies: An Overview. INFLIBNET Newsletter, 23, 19–33.

R Foundation (2020). The R project for statistical computing [online]. The R Foundation , [19.12.2021], https://www.R-project.org/

Roldan-Valadez, E., Salazar-Ruiz, S. Y., Ibarra-Contreras, R., Rios, C. (2019). Current Concepts on bibliometrics: A Brief Review About Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and Alternative Metrics. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 188(3), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1936-5

Schindler, D., Zapilko, B., Krüger, F. (2019). SoftwareKG [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3571350

Schindler, D., Zapilko, B., Krüger, F. (2020). Investigating Software Usage in the Social Sciences: A Knowledge Graph Approach. The Semantic Web, 271–286. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_16

Serrat, O. (2017). Social Network Analysis. In O. Serrat (ed.), Knowledge Solutions (pp. 39–43). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_9

Slater, L. (2012). PubMed PubReMiner. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association Des Bibliothèques de La Santé Du Canada, 33(2), 106–107. https://doi.org/10.5596/c2012-014

Smith, A. M., Katz, D. S., Niemeyer, K. E., FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group. (2016). Software Citation Principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e86. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86 Social network (2021, December 19). Social network analysis software [online]. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia [19.12.2021], https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_network_analysis_software&oldid=1041385709

Starr, J., Castro, E., Crosas, M., Dumontier, M., Downs, R. R., Duerr, R., ... Clark, T. (2015). Achieving Human and Machine Accessibility of Cited Data in Scholarly Publications. PeerJ Computer Science, 1,e1. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1

Tenner, H., Thurmayr, G. R., Thurmayr, R. (2003). Data Mining With Meva in MEDLINE. In P. Perner, R. Brause, & H.-G. Holzhütter (eds.), Medical Data Analysis (pp. 39–46). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39619-2_6

Todeschini, R., Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969

VOSviewer (1.6.17). (2021). [Windows]. https://www.vosviewer.com/downloads/VOSviewer_1.6.17_exe.zip

van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau & D. Wolfram (eds.), Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 285–320). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

Xu, S., Shu, G., Qiang, S., Lei, C., Xiumei, Z. (2013). Advances in Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery at Home and Abroad – A Bibliometric Analysis. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences [online], 17(20), 2732–2754.