Kulturowe ramy etyki. Wyzwania dla organizacji informacji i wiedzy
Widad Mustafa El Hadi
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-5071
Afiliacja: GERiiCO Laboratory, University of Lille, Francja
Abstrakt
Cel/Teza: Podczas projektowania systemów organizacji wiedzy, aspekt kulturowy wyznacza jedną z ram interpretacyjnych, do której zalicza się również wymiar społeczny i polityczny. Mają one istotny wpływ na rozważania na temat etycznej natury systemów organizacji wiedzy. W artykule scharakteryzowano kulturowe ramy etyki poprzez identyfikację kluczowych typów uprzedzeń w systemach organizacji wiedzy. Tego typu uprzedzenia zostały zbadane przez pryzmat etyki. Główny nacisk w rozważaniach położono na uprzedzenia strukturalne obecne w uniwersalnych schematach klasyfikacyjnych i innych językach informacyjno-wyszukiwawczych. Omówiono również problemy natury teoretycznej, przedstawiono wybrane przykłady uprzedzeń o charakterze kulturowym i rasowym oraz zaproponowano wybrane kierunki dalszych prac w tym obszarze.
Koncepcja/Metody badań: W artykule wykorzystano analizę i krytykę piśmiennictwa w celu identyfikacji metod wykrywania stronniczości w systemach organizacji wiedzy. Na tej podstawie przeanalizowano dwa języki informacyjne RAMEAU oraz LCSH w celu wykrycia przejawów marginalizacji, wykluczenia i stygmatyzacji w odniesieniu do francuskiego kontekstu kulturowego.
Wyniki i wnioski: Praktyczna wiedza z zakresu etyki informacji wśród pracowników bibliotek oraz innych instytucji informacyjnych jest niezbędna do skutecznego rozwiązywania problemów etycznych w systemach organizacji wiedzy.
Oryginalność/Wartość poznawcza: Zdefiniowano kulturowe ramy etyki i przedstawiono kilka przykładów, które pokazują trudności w eliminacji uprzedzeń w systemach organizacji wiedzy. Wyniki badań przeprowadzonych przez autorkę wraz z jej studentami na temat zakresu i rodzaju uprzedzeń w RAMEAU pokazały, że praca na rzecz eliminacji tych uprzedzeń dała pozytywne rezultaty, ale tylko w przypadku LCSH. W innych językach informacyjno-wyszukiwawczych opartych na LCSH przejęto i pozostawiono obecne tam różne typy uprzedzeń. Autorka postuluje systematyczną walkę z uprzedzeniami obecnymi w systemach organizacji wiedzy.
Słowa kluczowe
Etyka informacji; Kulturowe ramy etyki; Stronniczość w systemach organizacji wiedzy
Bibliografia
Adler, M. A., Tennis, J. T. (2013). Toward a Taxonomy of Harm in Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowledge Organization, 40(4), 266–272.
Barát, Á. H. (2008). Knowledge Organization in the Cross-cultural and Multicultural Society. In C. Arsenault, J. T. Tennis (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Organization: Vol. 11, Culture and Identity in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference, Montréal, Canada (91–97). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
Bawden, D., Robinson, L. (2013). Introduction to Information Science. London: Facet Publishing.
Beghtol, C. (2002). Universal Concepts, Cultural Warrant and Cultural Hospitality. In M. López-Hu¬ertas (ed.). Advances in Knowledge Organization: Vol. 8. Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration of Knowledge Across Boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, 10–13 July 2002, Granada, Spain (45–49). Würz¬burg: Ergon-Verlag.
Beghtol, C. (2005). Ethical Decision-Making for Knowledge Representation and Organization Sys¬tems for Global Use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 903–912.
Beghtol, C. (2008). Professional Values and Ethics in Knowledge Organization and Cataloging. Journal of Information Ethics, 17(1), 12–19.
Budd, J.M. (2006). Toward a Practical and Normative Ethics for Librarianship. The Library Quarterly, 76(3), 251–269.
Capurro, R., Frühbauer, J. (2007). Localizing the Internet: Ethical Aspects in Intercultural Perspective. Paderborn: Fink.
Carbo, T., Smith, M. M. (2008). Global Information Ethics: Intercultural Perspectives on Past and Future Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1111–1123.
Casenave, J., Mustafa El Hadi, W. (2019). Developments in Ethics of Knowledge Organization: From Critical Approaches to Classifications to Controlled Digital Communication Practices. In D. Haynes, J. Vernau (eds.). The Human Position in an Artificial World: Creativity, Ethics and AI in Knowledge Organization (114–127). Baden-Baden: Ergon Verlag.
Clavel-Merrin, G. (2004). MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects): A Virtual Authority File Across Languages. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39(1–2), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v39n01_02
Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design (10th Edition). Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Faletar, S. (2005). Short Overview of a Pan-European Cultural Heritage Project, CALIMERA. Library Hi Tech News, 22(2), 23–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419050510593371
Fallis, D. (2007). Information Ethics for 21st Century Library Professionals. Library Hi Tech, 25(1), 23–36.
Feinberg, M. (2007). Hidden Bias to Responsible Bias: An Approach to Information Systems Based on Haraway’s Situated Knowledges. Information Research [online], 12(4). [10.12.2019], http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis07.html
Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fox, M. J. (2011). Prototype Theory: An Alternative Concept Theory for Categorizing Sex and Gender? Knowledge Organization, 38(4), 328–334.
Fox, M. J., Olson, H. A. (2012). Feminist Epistemologies and Knowledge Organization. In R. P. Smiraglia,
H.-L. Lee (eds.). Cultural Frames of Knowledge (79–98). Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
Fox. M. J (2016). “Priorities of Arrangement” or a “Hierarchy of Oppressions?”: Perspectives on Intersectionality in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, 43(5), 373–383.
Froehlich, T. J. (1994). Ethical Concerns of Information Professionals in an International Context. In:
J.R. Alvarez-Ossorio, B. G. Goedegebuure (eds.). New Worlds in Information and Documentation (459–470). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Gutiérrez, G. A. (2002). Knowledge Organization from a ‘Culture of the Border’ Towards a Transcultural
Ethics of Mediation. In M. J. López-Huertas (ed.). Advances in Knowledge Organization, Vol. 8: Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration
of Knowledge Across Boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, July 10–13 Granada, Spain (516–522). Würzburg: Ergon.
Guimarães, J. A. C. (2000). O profissional da informação sob o prisma de sua formação. In M.L.P. Valentim (ed.). Profissionais da informação: formação e atuação profissional (53–70). São Paulo: Polis.
Guimarães, J. A. C. (2009). Ethical Values and Problems in Knowledge Organization and Representation.
Paper presented at the Ethics of Information Organization Conference, May 22–23 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Guimarães, J. A. C. (2015). Time and Space: Two Axes for Slanted Knowledge Organization. Paper
presented at Global and local Knowledge Organization Conference, August 12th 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Guimarães, J. A. C., Tognoli, N.B. (2015). Provenance as a Domain Analysis Approach in Archival
Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, 42 (8), 562–569.
Guimarães, J. A. C., Pinho, F. A., Milani, S. O. (2016). Theoretical Dialogs About Ethical Issues in
Knowledge Organization: García Gutiérrez, Hudon, Beghtol, and Olson. Knowledge Organization, 43(5), 338–350.
Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Haraway, D. J. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Haraway, D. J. (2007). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hauptman, R. (1991). Five Assaults on Our Integrity. In F.W. Lancaster (ed.). Ethics and the Librarian (83–91). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
Haynes, D., Vernau, J. (eds.). (2019). The Human Position in an Artificial World: Creativity, Ethics and AI in Knowledge Organization. Baden-Baden: Ergon-Verlag.
Higgins, M. (2016) Totally Invisible: Asian American Representation in the Dewey Decimal Classification, 1876–1996. Knowledge Organization, 43(8), 609–621.
Hjørland, B. (2008). Deliberate Bias in Knowledge Organization? In C. Arsenault, J. T. Tennis (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Organization, Vol. 11: Culture and Identity in Knowledge Organization,
Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference, Montréal, Canada (256–261). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hudon, M. (1997). Multilingual Thesaurus Construction-Integrating the Views of Different Cultures in One Gateway to Knowledge and Concepts. Knowledge Organization, 17(2/3), 111–123.
Hudon, M. (1999). Accessing Documents and Information in a World without Frontiers. The Indexer,21, 156–159.
Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Mai, J.-E. (2013). Ethics, Values and Morality in Contemporary Library Classifications. Knowledge Organization, 40(4), 242–53.
Mai, J.-E. (2016). Marginalization and Exclusion: Unraveling Systemic Bias in Classification. Know¬ledge Organization, 43(5), 324–330.
Martínez-Ávila, D., Guimarães, J. A. C. (2013). Library Classifications Criticisms: Universality, Post¬Structuralism and Ethics. Scire, 19(2), 21–26.
Ménard, E. (2012). TIIARA: the “making of” a bilingual taxonomy for retrieval of digital images. Library Hi Tech, 30(4), 643–654.
Ménard, E., Khashman, N., Kochkina, S., Torres-Moreno, J. M., Velazquez-Morales, P., Zhou, F.,... Pontes, E. L. (2016). A Second Life for TIIARA: From Bilingual to Multilingual! Knowledge Or¬ganization, 43(1), 22–34.
Mustafa El Hadi, W. (2017). Diversité culturelle et linguistique et dimension éthique dans l’organisa¬tion des connaissances. In P. Fraysse, C. Gardiès, I. Fabre (eds.). Sur les sciences de l’information et de la communication, Contributions hybrides autour des travaux de Viviane Couzinet (412–426). Toulouse: CÉPADUÈS-Éditions, Éditions scientifiques et techniques.
Olson, H. A. (1996a). Dewey Thinks, Therefore He is: The Epistemic Stance of Dewey and DDC. In R. Green (ed.). Advances in Knowledge Organization, Vol. 5: Knowledge Organization and Chan¬ge: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, July 15–18, 1996, Washington, DC (302–312). Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag.
Olson, H. A. (1996b). The Power to Name: Marginalizations and Exclusions of Subject Representation in Library Catalogues. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
Olson, H.A. (1999). Exclusivity, Teleology and Hierarchy: Our Aristotelean Legacy. Knowledge Or¬ganization, 26(2), 65–73.
Olson, H. A. (2000). Difference, Culture and Change: The Untapped Potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1–2), 53–71.
Olson, H. A. (2002). The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Olson, H.A. (2011). Sameness and Difference. Library Resources & Technical Services, 45(3), 115–122. Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28–29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA.
Rusquart, J. (2019). Évaluation éthique du répertoire d’autorités matières encyclopédique et alpha¬bétique : RAMEAU et des systèmes de classification en general. Master 1 Dissertation thesis. University of Lille.
Smiraglia, R. P. (2012). Epistemology of Domain Analysis. In R. P. Smiraglia, H.-L. Lee (eds.), Cultural Frames of Knowledge (111–124). Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
Special Issue: “A Festschrift for Hope A. Olson,” Guest Editor Thomas Walker, Knowledge Organi¬zation, 43(5), 2016.
Tran, Q. T. (2019). Marginality and Non-Uniformity in Subject Representation: An Analysis of Human Rights Concepts. The 5th International Scientific Conference Information Science in the Age of Change – Digital revolution – Today and tomorrow, Warsaw, Poland, May 2019.
Tran, Q. T. (2018a). Knowledge Organization Systems and Cultural Interoperability in Open Humani¬tarian Settings. In F. Ribeiro, M. E. Cerveira (eds.). Advances in Knowledge Organization. Challenges and Opportunities for Knowledge Organization in the Digital Age: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Interan¬tional ISKO Conference 9–11 July 2018 Porto, Portugal (1st ed., 624–632). Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag.
Tran, Q. T. (2018b). Ethically Responsible Knowledge Organization Systems: Towards an Intercultural User Interface. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej. Studia Informacyjne, 55(2), 16–29.
Tennis, J. T. (2012). Le poids du langage et de l’action dans l’organisation des connaissances : Position épistémologique, action méthodologique et perspective théorique. Études de communication, 39, 15–40.
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-5071
Afiliacja: GERiiCO Laboratory, University of Lille, Francja
Biogram:
Professor WIDAD MUSTAFA EL HADI is a Professor of Information and Documentation Studies at the University of Lille. She holds a Ph.D. in linguistics (multilingual terminologies) from the University of Lyon 2, France. Her main interests are: theoretical approaches to knowledge organization; language and culture and their impact on knowledge organization; knowledge organization systems and their evaluation; cross-language and cross-cultural information retrieval, and, more recently, digital humanities and ethics in knowledge organization. She has been active in ISKO (International Society for Knowledge Organization) since 1996, as a co-founder of the French ISKO Chapter (with Jacques Maniez). She is currently ISKO-France president, elected in November 2015. She publishes regularly on knowledge organization, digital cultures and digital humanities.
Contact to the Author:
widad.mustafa@univ-lille.fr
Laboratoire GERiiCO
Domaine Universitaire du Pont de Bois
59650 Villeneuve-d’Ascq, France
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe
