Poza edukacją kompetencji: rozwój sektora bibliotecznego wsparcia dla badań 2.0

ACRL (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL.: Association of College and Research Libraries.

ACRL (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago, IL.: Association of College and Research Libraries.

ANDS (2017). Data citation [online]. Australian National Data Service, [09.04.2017], http://www.ands.org.au/working-with-data/citation-and-identifiers/data-citation

Boyd, D.; Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological,and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.

Briney, K. (2016). Strategic planning for research data services. Bulletin of the Association for InformationScience and Technology, 42(4), 39–41.

Bruce, C. S. (2008). Informed learning. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

Brydges, B.; Clarke, K. (2015). Is it time to re-envision the role of academic librarians in facultyresearch? [online] Library Connect, 13(7), [09.04.2017] http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/2015–07/it-time-re-envision-role-academic-librarians-faculty-research

Calzada Prado, J.; Marzal, M. Á. (2013). Incorporating Data Literacy into Information LiteracyPrograms: Core Competencies and Contents. Libri, 63(2), 123–134.

Cao, L. (2016). Data science: nature and pitfalls. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(5), 66–75.

Chao, T. (2015). Mapping methods metadata for research data. International Journal of Digital Curation 10(1), 82–94.

Carter, D.; Sholler, D. (2016). Data science on the ground: Hype, criticism, and everyday work. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 7(10), 2309–2319.

Christensen-Dalsgaard, B. et al (2012), Ten recommendations for libraries to get started with research data management. [online], LIBER, [09.04.2017] http://www.libereurope.eu/news/ten-recommendations-for-libraries-to-get-started-with-research-data-management

CIBER (2016). Early career researchers: the harbingers of change? Final report from CIBER. Year 1[online], CIBER-Research.UK, [09.04.2017], http://ciber-research.eu/download/20161120-ECR_Year_1_final_report_071116.pdf

Crusoe, D. (2016). Data Literacy defined pro populo: To read this article, please provide a little information.The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3), 27–46.

DATACITE (2016a). Why is it so important to cite data? [online]. DataCite, [09.04.2017], https://www.datacite.org/cite-your-data.html

DATACITE, (2016b). Metadata Schema 4.0 [online]. DataCite, [09.04.2017], https://schema.datacite.org/

DCC (2015). What is digital curation? [online]. London: Digital Curation Centre [09.04.2017] http://www.dcc.ac.uk/digital-curation/what-digital-curation

DGI (2017). The DGI Data Governance Framework. [online]. London: Data Governance Institute,[09.04.2017], http://www.datagovernance.com/dgi-data-governance-framework/

ECAR (2015). The Compelling Case for Data Governance. [online]. EDUCAUSE ECAR Working Group [09.04.2017], http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/compelling-case-data-governance

Eaker, C. (2014). Educating researchers for effective data management. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(3), 45–46.

Erway, R; Horton, L.; Nurnberger, A.; Otsuji, R.; Rushing, A. (2015). Building Blocks: Laying the Foundation for a Research Data Management Program. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research [online], OCLC [09.04.2017], http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2016/oclcresearch-datamanagement-building-blocks-2016.pdf

Giarlo, M. (2013). Academic Libraries as Quality Hubs. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(3), 1–10.

Goben, A.; Raszewski, R. (2015). Research data management self-education for librarians: a webliography [online]. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 82, [09.04.2017], http://www.istl.org/15-fall/internet2.html

Higman, R.; Teperek, M.; Kingsley, D. (2017). Creating a Community of Data Champions. bioRxiv, 104661, DOI 10.1101/104661

IBM (2012). Successful information governance through high-quality data. Somers, NY: IBM Corporation.

Jackman, L. W.; Weiner, S. A. (2017). The rescinding of the ACRL 2000 Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education–Really? College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(1), 117–119.

Jahnke, L.; Asher, A.; Keralis, S. D. (2012). The problem of data. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.

Khatri, V.; Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148–152.

Koltay, T. (2015a). Data literacy: In search of a name and identity. Journal of Documentation, 71(2), 401–415.

Koltay, T. (2015b). Research 2.0, research data services and academic libraries. Praktyka i Teoria Informacji Naukowej i Technicznej, 23(4), 3–12.

Koltay, T. (2016a). Are you ready? Tasks and roles for academic libraries in supporting Research 2.0. New Library World, 117(1–2), 94–104.

Koltay, T. (2016b). Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality, IFLA Journal, 42(4), 303–312.

Koltay, T.; Špiranec, S.; Z. Karvalics, L. (2015). The shift of information literacy towards research 2.0. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 87–93.

Kouper, I. (2016). Professional participation in digital curation. Library & Information Science Research, 38(3), 212–223.

LERU (2013). LERU Roadmap for Research Data. Leuven: League of European Research Universities Research Data Working Group [online]. LERU [29.08.2017], http://www.leru.org/index.php/public/publications/year/2013/

Lyon, L.; Mattern, E. (2016). Education for real-world data science roles (Part 2): A translational approach to curriculum development. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(2), 13–26.

Lyon, L.; Mattern, E.; Acker, A.; Langmead, A. (2015). Applying translational principles to data science curriculum development [online]. In: iPres Conference Proceedings, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2–6 November 2015, D-Scholarship, Institutional Repository of the University of Pittsburgh [29.08.2017], http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/27159/

Maybee, C.; Zilinski, L. (2015). Data informed learning: A next phase data literacy framework for higher education. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4.

McLure, M.; Level, A.V.; Cranston, C.L.; Oehlerts, B.; Culbertson, M. (2014). Data curation: A study of researcher practices and needs. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(2), 139–164.

Mooney, H.; Newton, M. P. (2012). The anatomy of a data citation: Discovery, reuse, and credit. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(1), 1–14.

Nelson, N.; Huffman, J. (2015). Predatory journals in library databases: How much should we worry? The Serials Librarian 69(2), 169–192.

Nicholas, D.; Clark, D.; Herman, E. (2016). ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered. Learned Publishing, 29(3), 173–182.

Nielsen, H. J.; Hjørland, B. (2014). Curating research data: the potential roles of libraries and information professionals. Journal of Documentation, 70(2), 221–240.

Partlo, K., Symons, D., & Carlson, J. D. (2015). Revolutionary or evolutionary? Making research data management manageable. In: B. L. Eden (ed.) Creating Research Infrastructures in the 21st--Century Academic Library: Conceiving, Funding, and Building New Facilities and Staff. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield. 175–201.

Pasquetto, I. V.; Sands, A. E.; Borgman, C. L. (2015). Exploring openness in data and science: What is “open,” to whom, when, and why? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–2.

Patel, D. (2016). Research data management: a conceptual framework. Library Review, 65(4–5), 226–241.

Peters, I.; Bar-Ilan, J. (2014). Informetrics, bibliometrics, altmetrics: What is it all about? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–4.

Poole, A. H. (2017). The conceptual ecology of digital humanities. Journal of Documentation, 73(1), 91–122.

Rice, R.; Southall, J. (2016). The data librarian’s handbook. London: Facet Publishing.

Ridsdale, Ch.; Rothwell, J.; Smit, M., Ali-Hassan, H.; Bliemel, M.; Dean, I.; Kelley, D.; Matwin, S.; Wuetherick, B. (2015). Strategies and best practices for data literacy education: Knowledge synthesis report. Halifax, NS: Dalhousie University [online], Mike Smit, [09.04.2017], http://www.mikesmit.com/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/data_literacy.pdf

Robinson, L. (2016). Editorial. Alexandria, 26(2), 73–76.

Sharma, S.; Qin, J. (2014). Data management: Graduate student’s awareness of practices and policies. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–3.

Tenopir, C.; Allard, S.; Sinha, P.; Pollock, D.; Newman, J.; Dalton, E.; Frame, M.; Baird, L. (2016). Data management education from the perspective of science educators. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(1), 232–251.

Tenopir, C.; Pollock, D.; Allard, S.; Hughes, D. (2016). Research data services in European and north American libraries: Current offerings and plans for the future. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–6.

University of Edinburgh (2015). Why is data management important? Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh [online], [29.08.2017], http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/information-services/research-support/data-management/why-manage-data

Watkinson, A.; Nicholas, D.; Thornley, C.; Herman, E.; Jamali, H. R.; Volentine, R.; Allard, S.; Levine, K.; Tenopir, C. (2016). Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis. Information Processing & Management, 52(3), 446–458.

York, J.; Gutmann, M.; Berman, F. (2016), What Do We Know About The Stewardship Gap? [online]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, [29.08.2017] http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/122726

Zilinski, L. D.; Nelson, M. S. (2014). Thinking critically about data consumption: Creating the data credibility checklist. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–4.